Tuesday, 31 May 2016

A crude awakening

Release: 2006
Directors/Producers: Basil Gelpke, Raymond McCormack, Reto Caduff
Music: Daniel Schnyder
Editing: Georgia Wyss
Running time:  94 minutes
As a person who considers himself left-leaning, environmentally friendly and right on (in theory), this writer has become used to a certain formula when watching documentaries.  The well-meaning, well-informed socially conscious individual, imploring one and all to join up and fight for the worthy cause.  And, for the most part it’s impressive.  Watching earnest, erudite people make an intelligent case for the freedom of killer whales or the re-evaluation of how we operate economically as a society, is as about engaging as it gets.  That is, until you come across a documentary where the rest of the talking heads are hardline capitalists (or functionaries of said capitlaism), who have gorged on and promoted the use of our oil resources for decades, and they agree with those other guys!
When experts in the field of science, such as oil geologists (Colin J. Campbell), tell you that the world’s oil supply is depleting and cannot be sustained, and that in a very short space of time we need to find alternatives, you take notice.  In a documentary film of this kind the director usually follows this with short clips of a bunch of self-interested, right-wing capitalist  blowhards telling the cry-babies to calm down, and that all is under control, thereby creating antagonists.  Not this time.  Not even a little.  Directors Gelpke, McCormack and Caduff line up an illustrious group of oil industry experts such as GOP Representative Roscoe Bartlett, George W. Bush’s energy advisor Matthew Simmons and Fadhil al-Chalabi the former OPEC Executive Secretary General.  And what is their standpoint in this debate?  Shut up you whimpering tree huggers?  Nope. Simply put, we are running out of oil.  To a man, each one of them factually, and without quibble states that oil production has peaked and we need to change strategy.  All row in behind M. King Hubbert’s theory of ‘Peak Oil’, which outlines the point at which we will see oil supply only decrease.  He estimated this to be around the year 2020.
The film moves swiftly on to the consequences of this projected oil shortfall.  Horrifying scenarios include an inability to sustain the current level of population on the planet.  It’s suggested that the downward population adjustment may happen through famine and extreme poverty.  Given the current levels of economic inequality in this world, this a truly sobering thought.  A vague reference is made to humankind rolling back it’s use of technologies and transport.  The talking heads suggest a world where flight, and possibly even road travel will be a luxury that only the richest of the rich may permit themselves due to exhorbitant price increases for oil.  Only Alfred M. Spormann, a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, of Chemical Engineering and, by courtesy, of Biology at Stanford, optimistically supports the idea of the constant forward movement of evolution and technology.
As for new energy technologies such as wind and solar nobody seems to be painting a pretty picture.  All agree, that yes, the technologies do indeed exist, but are nowhere near polished enough to replace the behemoth that is oil.  Estimates range from 30 to 40 years, if not more, before a suitable, renewable energy will be perfected as a substitute to oil, capable of fulfilling our current and future energy needs.  However, given that this film was made in 2006, this may no longer be the case.  In fact films such as ‘Catching the sun’, insist that solar technology is ready to provide the energy needed, and all that is lacking in countries like the United States is the political will to upset the old petroleum order.  They quote Germany and China as two world powers hellbent on, and in fact implementing renewable energy policies on a grand scale.
Whatever the case, ‘A crude awakening’ makes it’s point extremely well.  Scientists outlining a cataclysmic event in the near future, makes for slightly uncomfortable viewing for the distanced viewer.  But add industry heavyweights backing them up and an a compelling race against time and you’ve got a documentary worth it’s weight in oil.